Pope Pius XI instituted
The Feast of Christ the King in 1925 for the universal church in his
encyclical Quas Primas.
He connected the increasingly denial of Christ as king to the rise of
secularism. At the time of Quas Primas, many Christians (including
Catholics) began to doubt Christ's authority and existence, as well as the
Church's power to continue Christ's authority. Pius XI, and the rest of the
Christian world, witnessed the rise of non-Christian dictatorships in Europe,
and saw Catholics being taken in by these earthly leaders. These dictators
often attempted to assert authority over the Church. Just as the Feast of Corpus Christi was instituted when devotion to the
Eucharist was at a low point, the Feast of Christ the King was instituted
during a time when respect for Christ and the Church was waning, when the feast
was needed most.
Pius hoped the
institution of the feast would have various effects. They were:
1. That nations would
see that the Church has the right to freedom, and immunity from the state (Quas
Primas, 32).
2. That leaders and nations would see that they are bound to give respect to Christ (Quas Primas, 31).
3. That the faithful would gain strength and courage from the celebration of the feast, as we are reminded that Christ must reign in our hearts, minds, wills, and bodies (Quas Primas, 33).
2. That leaders and nations would see that they are bound to give respect to Christ (Quas Primas, 31).
3. That the faithful would gain strength and courage from the celebration of the feast, as we are reminded that Christ must reign in our hearts, minds, wills, and bodies (Quas Primas, 33).
Today, the same distrust
of authority exists, although the problem has gotten worse. Individualism has
been embraced to such an extreme, that for many, the only authority is the
individual self. The idea of Christ as ruler is rejected in such a strongly individualistic
system. Also, many balk at the idea of kings and queens, believing them to be
antiquated and possibly oppressive. Some even reject the titles of
"lord" and "king" for Christ because they believe that such
titles are borrowed from oppressive systems of government. However true these
statements might be (some kings have been oppressive), these individuals miss
the point: Christ's kingship is one of humility and service.
(With thanks to
ChurchYear.Net)